Weekly brief · week of 3 June 2024

Week of 3 June 2024: Bitcoin gains 2.78% while Ether falls 1.97% on light volume

When Bitcoin and Ether move in opposite directions over one week on below-average volume, what does the divergence show, and what would confirm or reverse it?

BTC rose from 67,765.62 to 69,648.14 (+2.78%) while ETH fell from 3,780.92 to 3,706.40 (-1.97%), a gap of 4.75 percentage points. The ETH/BTC ratio dropped 4.62%. Volume ran below normal: BTC at 0.64 times its prior twelve-week average, ETH at 0.58 times.

What the data shows. BTC rose 2.78% and ended 5.34% below its 52-week high. ETH fell 1.97% and ended 8.88% below its high. BTC outperformed ETH by 4.75 percentage points, and the ETH/BTC ratio fell 4.62% over the week. The two assets moved together closely hour by hour (correlation 0.84), yet BTC still finished higher while ETH finished lower. Their worst day was the same: Friday 7 June, -2.04% for BTC and -3.54% for ETH, and both posted their largest one-hour moves in the hour starting 17:00 UTC that day (-1.51% and -1.58%). BTC's best day was Tuesday 4 June (+2.51%); ETH's was Wednesday 5 June (+1.46%). Trading was quiet: BTC dollar volume of 11.58 billion was 0.64 times the prior twelve-week average, ETH's 6.04 billion was 0.58 times.

What it does not show. The candles cannot say why one asset gained while the other lost. Light volume does not distinguish absent interest from smaller tickets. Nothing here identifies who was selling ETH, and the Friday lows do not establish a direction for the following week.

What a careful desk would check. Close location — where the final candle sits between the week's low and high — was 46.4% for BTC and 37.0% for ETH, so both closed in the lower half of their ranges despite BTC's weekly gain. The prior four weeks show ETH swinging harder (a +24.59% week against BTC's +3.37%), so a desk would ask whether this week is one rotation or the start of a trend, and would compare realised volatility (32.6% for BTC, 33.3% for ETH) with the small price ranges actually used.

Funding. Both markets paid funding all week: BTC averaged 0.0109% per eight hours, ETH 0.0129%, with ETH's peak at 0.0203%. Longs were paying shorts throughout, including during ETH's decline.

What would change this reading

  • If ETH/BTC keeps falling after a -4.62% week, the divergence reads as a trend rather than a single-week rotation.
  • If a later week trades below ETH's low of 3,600.00, Friday's -3.54% day looks like the start of a decline rather than a dip.
  • If BTC volume returns from 0.64 times towards its prior twelve-week average while price holds near 69,648.14, the week's gain carries more weight.
  • If funding turns negative while BTC sits 5.34% and ETH 8.88% below their 52-week highs, the case for crowded longs weakens.

Terms

ETH/BTC ratio
the price of one Ether expressed in Bitcoin; it falls when Ether underperforms Bitcoin
close location
where the week's closing price sits between the week's low and high, as a percentage
hourly correlation
how closely two prices moved together hour by hour, from -1 to 1

Research notes on real market weeks, not investment advice. Sources: Binance spot BTCUSDT and ETHUSDT 1-hour candles and USD-M perpetual funding rates; weekly figures computed by WSTiger.

RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com